Appeal No. 2006-0825 Application No. 10/253,333 In conclusion, based on the foregoing, it is our judgment that the examiner has established a prima facie case of obviousness for the claimed subject matter that has not been rebutted by appellants. Accordingly, the examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHUNG K. PAK ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) PETER F. KRATZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:hh 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007