Appeal No. 2006-0827
Application 10/025,214
al.” (Page 10 of principal brief, penultimate paragraph). For the
reasons set forth above, we do not subscribe to appellants’
position.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well-
stated by the examiner, the examiner’s decision rejecting the
appealed claims is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.36(a)(iv)
(effective Sept. 13, 2004; 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (Aug. 12, 2004);
1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (Sept, 7, 2004)).
AFFIRMED
Edward C. Kimlin )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Thomas A. Waltz ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Jeffrey T. Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ECK/cam
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007