Ex Parte Davis et al - Page 6

          Appeal No. 2006-0828                                                        
          Application No. 10/252,175                                                  

               As a final point, we note that appellants base no argument             
          upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected               
          results.                                                                    
               In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner’s                  
          decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed.                         
          No time period for taking any subsequent action in                          
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).                                                          

                                      AFFIRMED                                        
                                                                                     


                                                                                     
               EDWARD C. KIMLIN             )                                         
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )                                    
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )   BOARD OF PATENT                 
                    BRADLEY R. GARRIS            )     APPEALS AND                    
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )    INTERFERENCES                   
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
          CHUNG K. PAK                 )                                              
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )                                    

          ECK:hh                                                                      
                                          6                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007