Ex Parte Weirauch et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         



                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        

                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                      ____________                                                     
                              Ex parte  CHARLES R. WEIRAUCH and JOEL B. LARNER                                         
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                Appeal No.  2006-0829                                                  
                                              Application No.  09/921,024                                              
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
              Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
              RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   



                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       


                     This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 3 and 4.  Claims              
              1 and 2 have been canceled and claims 5 and 6 have been withdrawn from                                   
              consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention.                                              











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007