Appeal No. 2006-0830
Application No. 09/911,954
components and that we should look to the specification in order to
determine what the claims mean. We disposed of these arguments
supra. Accordingly, we will sustain the rejection of claims 25
and 26 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103.
The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-20, 22-24, and 27
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and claims 21, 25, and 26 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 is affirmed.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007