Ex Parte Goodwin et al - Page 1




                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                
                    written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                



                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                  ____________                                                        
                  Ex parte ANDREW JAMES GOODWIN, DANIEL EDWARD FUTTER,                                                
                      PATRICK JEAN JACQUES MERLIN, and JAS PAL SINGH BADYAL                                           
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                             Appeal No. 2006-0856                                                     
                                        Application No. 10/148,993                                                    
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                  ____________                                                        
             Before PAK, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
             WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      



             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                       
                    This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of                    
             claims 2, 4 through 8, and 12 through 18, which are the only claims pending in this                      
             application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                          
                    According to appellants, the invention is directed to a method of forming a                       
             coating on a substrate surface, which coating comprises SiOx groups, by plasma                           
             treatment of the surface where the substrate comprises a blend of an organic polymeric                   









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007