Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:
1. A method of configurating a communication system
comprising:
recording details of the operation of said
communication system;
electronically communicating said details of operating
to configuration server;
examining said details of operation and generating
identification data identifying said communication system;
and
transmitting said identification data to said
communication system to facilitate configuration of said
communication system.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art:
Dolin, Jr. et al. (Dolin) 5,420,572 May 30, 1995
Lucas et al. (Lucas) 5,703,938 Dec. 30, 1997
Claims 1-3, 6, and 7 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being
anticipated by Dolin. Claims 4 and 5 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Dolin in view of Lucas.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the Examiner, reference is
made to the Briefs1 and Answer for their respective details.
1 The Appeal Brief was filed May 12, 2003. In response to the Examiner’s Answer mailed
July 1, 2003, a Reply Brief was filed July 24, 2003 which was acknowledged and entered by the
Examiner as indicated in the communication mailed August 7, 2003.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007