Appeal No. 2006-0871
Application No. 10/678,799
We now consider the rejection of claims 7, 9, 10 and 17-19
based on Matsumoto, Falk, Kane and Periou. Since Periou does not
overcome the deficiencies in the basic combination of references
for reasons discussed above, we also do not sustain the
examiner’s rejection of these claims.
In summary, we have not sustained either of the examiner’s
rejections of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of
the examiner rejecting claims 1-3, 6, 7, 9-13 and 16-19 is
reversed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007