The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KARL-HEINZ BAUMANN, ULRICH BRUHNKE,
JURGEN KOHLER, UWE KREMPELS and
HANSJORG SCHINKE
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0873
Application No. 10/043,277
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: August 31, 2006
____________
Before CRAWFORD, BAHR and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 39, 42,
58 and 61. Claims 27, 31, 32, 34-37, 40, 41, 44-47, 51-56, 59 and 60, the only
other claims remaining in the application, have been indicated to be allowable (see
advisory action mailed June 24, 2004).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007