The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte EUGEN KOREN and
MIRNA KOSCEC
__________
Appeal No. 2006-0874
Application No. 08/970,045
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
Per curiam
DISMISSAL OF APPEAL
This application contains claims 1-13 and 39-47. Claims 1-11, 39, and 41-47
stand allowed and claims 12, 13, and 40 stand rejected. See the Advisory Action
mailed March 4, 2004.
On February 16, 2006, Appellants filed a request to withdraw the appeal as to
claims 12, 13, and 40. Since those are all of the claims on appeal, the appeal in this
application is dismissed.
According to the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, § 1215.02, “[i]f an
application contains allowed claims, as well as claims on appeal, the withdrawal of the
Page: 1 2 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007