Ex Parte Mizuno et al - Page 9

                Appeal 2006-0886                                                                                  
                Application 10/151,093                                                                            
                                                CONCLUSION                                                        
                       In summary, we affirm with respect to the rejection of claims 1-17                         
                under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Lickes alone or in view of                          
                Nguyen.                                                                                           
                       No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                         
                this appeal maybe extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(2005).                               



                                                  AFFIRMED                                                        




                cam                                                                                               

                Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch                                                                   
                P. O. Box 747                                                                                     
                Falls Church, VA   22040-0747                                                                     














                                                        9                                                         


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9

Last modified: November 3, 2007