Appeal No. 2006-0902 3 Application No. 10/125,942 in the respective specification for the specific packing fraction range recited in the subject claims. In our prior decision, we also found that the appellants did not establish that a packing fraction value within the recited range would inevitably result by practicing the disclosed invention, considering that the original specification contemplates a wide variety of starting materials and a broad range of process parameters. The only evidence before us now, which was not before us when we rendered our prior decision, is in the form of a declaration by Lance Jacobsen. We have carefully considered the Jacobsen Declaration. Having done so, we agree with the examiner that the Jacobsen Declaration fails to establish that a packing fraction of 4-11% is an inherent feature of the titanium powder produced according to the process described in appellants’ disclosure. Jacobsen reports that “[I]n over 200 runs of the Armstrong Process, the packing fraction of the powder has been in the range of from 4 percent to 11 percent.” (Declaration, paragraph 7). We presume that Jacobson, in referring to “200 runs of the Armstrong Process”, is referring to the process which is the subject ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007