Appeal No. 2006-0916 Application No. 10/345,711 dispersible polyisocyanate. We do not find this argument persuasive. A reference is said to teach away when “it suggests that the line of development flowing from the reference’s disclosure is unlikely to be productive of the result sought by the applicant.” In re Gurley, 27 F.3d 551, 553, 31 USPQ2d 1130, 1131 (Fed. Cir. 1994). As we discussed above, Markusch teaches that the reaction may be facilitated “by mixing the above described components either in one stage or in several stages in an intermittently or continuously operating mixing apparatus” and places no limitation on the order of addition of the components. (Column 14, lines 37-43.) Markusch even discloses an example where polyisocyanate is added last. (Example 1.) The appellants have not directed us to any teaching in Markusch or other evidence that would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art that “the line of development flowing from the reference’s disclosure is unlikely to be productive of the result sought by the applicant.” The appellants urge that “[s]ince the particulate material [in Markusch’s Example 1] is non-absorbent and the amount of water added is so large compared to the amount of particulate 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007