Ex Parte Goldstein et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                      
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                            ________________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                                     Ex parte FARZAD PARSAPOUR                                               
                                            ________________                                                 
                                             Appeal 2006-2258                                                
                                          Application 10/170,116                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                            ________________                                                 
                                       Decided:  September 20, 2006                                          
                                            ________________                                                 
                Before GARRIS, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s Final                      
                Rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 through 8, and 10 through 13, which are the only                 
                claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to                        
                35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                                             
                      According to Appellant, the invention is directed to a method of                       
                manufacturing a color filter on a luminescent screen assembly of a color                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007