Ex Parte White - Page 2

          Appeal Number: 2006-0923                                                    
          Application Number: 10/622,157                                              

               12. A mobile animal hospital comprising:                               
                    a trailer having a frame and at least one set of                  
               wheels;                                                                
          a squeeze chute mounted on the trailer, and wherein                         
               the squeeze chute remains stationary in a horizontal plane             
               with respect to the set of wheels; and                                 
          wherein the at least one set of wheels is adapted to                        
               raise relative to the frame of the trailer such that at                
               least a portion of the frame of the trailer rests at ground            
               level when treating animals.                                           
               33.  A structure comprising:                                           
                    a trailer having tongue, a frame, and at least one set            
               of wheels; and                                                         
                    a squeeze chute coupled to the frame of the trailer,              
               and wherein the position of the squeeze chute relative to              
               the tongue is the same for both treating animals using the             
               squeeze chute and relocation of the trailer;                           
          wherein the at least one set of wheels is adapted to                        
               raise relative to the frame of the trailer such that at                
               least a portion of the frame of the trailer rests at ground            
               level when treating animals.                                           
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Lerma et al. (Lerma)           4,842,316           Jun. 27, 1989            
          Mollhagen                      RE 33,959           Jun. 16, 1992            
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 12-17, 33                 
          and 34 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Mollhagen, and            
          claim 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Mollhagen in view            
          of Lerma.                                                                   







                                          2                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007