Appeal No. 2006-0933
Application No. 09/740,400
Turning to a consideration of the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 15-19, 34-38, and 53-57
based on separate combinations of He with Redpath and
Prafullchandra, we do not sustain this rejection as well. The
Redpath and Prafullchandra references have been added to He by the
Examiner to address, respectively, the graphical user interface and
target password change policy features set forth in the rejected
dependent claims. We find nothing, however, in the disclosures
Redpath or Prafullchandra which would overcome the innate
deficiencies of He discussed supra.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007