Appeal No. 2006-0937
Application No. 10/367,289
with argument or evidence in opposition thereto. See In re
Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir.
1992). We hereby sustain, therefore, the examiner’s § 102
rejection of argued claim 1 as well as non-argued claims 2-4 and
7 as being anticipated by Odan.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(I)(iv)(2005).
AFFIRMED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
TERRY J. OWENS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
PETER F. KRATZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CKP/sld
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007