The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication in a law journal
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte LEV KORENEVSKY
________________
Appeal No. 2006-0940
Application No. 10/037,548
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
This application is remanded to the examiner for the
purpose of allowing the examiner to respond to appellant's
arguments set forth in the Reply Brief which were not presented
in the principal brief. Appellant's Reply Brief presents
arguments against each of the examiner's 35 U.S.C § 102
rejections that did not appear in the main brief. For instance,
with respect to the examiner's § 102 rejection over Thackara,
appellant maintains that elements 17 and 26 of Thackara "are not
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007