The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte MATTHEW B. HOYT, BOBBY J. BAILEY, STANLEY A. MCINTOSH, PHILLIP E. WILSON, and GARY W. SHORE _____________ Appeal No. 2006-0941 Application No. 10/059,364 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before PAK, OWENS, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. REMAND TO THE EXAMINER The appellants’ claim 20, which is the sole independent claim, recites that the nylon core polymer has “an amine end group (AEG) content of between about 10 meq/kg which is susceptible to dyeing ...”. The other end point of the amine end group content is not recited. We therefore remand the application to the examiner for the examiner to consider rejecting claim 20 as being indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph. 1Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007