Ex Parte Burleson - Page 2



         Appeal No. 2006-0947                                                       
         Application No. 09/732,741                                                 

              Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it              
         reads as follows:                                                          
              1. A system for creating bookmarks of pages found within a            
         network, said pages being displayed on a browser, said system              
         comprising:                                                                
              a graphic user interface comprising at least one button               
         adapted to automatically add a bookmark address of a page being            
         currently displayed on said browser and associated commentary to           
         a public bookmark Web page, wherein said associated commentary             
         includes different comments for different groups that will be              
         reviewing said public bookmark Web page; and                               
              an automatic page creator adapted to create said public               
         bookmark Web page.                                                         
              The reference relied on by the examiner is:                           
         Adar et al. (Adar)       6,493,702                Dec. 10, 2002            
                                                 (filed May 5, 1999)                
              Claims 1 through 7, 13 through 18 and 24 through 29 stand             
         rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Adar.            
              Reference is made to the brief and the answer for the                 
         respective positions of the appellant and the examiner.                    
                                      OPINION                                       
              We have carefully considered the entire record before us,             
         and we will reverse the anticipation rejection of claims 1                 
         through 7, 13 through 18 and 24 through 29.                                
              The examiner is of the opinion (answer, page 3) that “Adar            
         discloses that the associated commentary includes different                
         comments for different groups that will be reviewing the public            
                                         2                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007