Appeal No. 2006-0948 Application No. 10/354,756 passing said web of insulator material around one of said guide rollers; folding said outer edges of said web of insulator material around end turns of springs of said spring assembly; and securing said web of insulator material to itself to secure said web of insulator material to said spring assembly. The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of unpatentability: Withoff 3,325,833 Jun. 20, 1967 Wooldridge et al. 3,813,843 Jun. 04, 1974 Mossbeck 6,175,997 Jan. 23, 2001 Claims 1, 3, 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious over Mossbeck in view of Withoff. Claims 1, 2 and 4 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious over Wooldridge in view of Withoff. We refer to the brief and reply brief and to the answer for a discussion of the respective viewpoints expressed by the appellant and by the examiner concerning the above noted rejections. OPINION For the reasons set forth below, we will not sustain either of these rejections. Rejection over Mossbeck in view of Withoff Claims 1, 3, 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious over Mossbeck in view of Withoff. According to the examiner, 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007