Ex Parte Chandrasekaran - Page 1




                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  

                               Ex parte CHANDRU CHANDRASEKARAN                                              
                                              ____________                                                  

                                          Appeal No. 2006-0959                                              
                                        Application No. 10/075,914                                          
                                         Technology Center 3700                                             
                                              ____________                                                  

                                         Decided:  August 31, 2006                                          
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           
                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This appeal involves claims 1-27, which are all of the claims pending                 
               in this application.  We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to                       
               35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                                             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007