Ex Parte Rastegar - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                         for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     ___________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ___________                                      
                            Ex parte JAHANGIR S. RASTEGAR                             
                                     ___________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2006-0974                                  
                             Application No. 10/244,336                               
                               Technology Center 3600                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before FRANKFORT, OWENS, and BAHR, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from a rejection of claims 56-63.  Claims 1-            
          55 and 64-114 have been canceled.                                           
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellant claims a structural beam having a cavity                 
          containing a non-compressible material which, the appellant                 
          states (specification, page 1, lines 5-10), provides rigidity               
          and/or vibration dampening.  Claim 56 is illustrative:                      
               56.  A structural beam comprising:                                     
          an upper surface;                                                           
          a lower surface;                                                            

                                          1                                           


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007