The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte JAHANGIR S. RASTEGAR ___________ Appeal No. 2006-0974 Application No. 10/244,336 Technology Center 3600 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before FRANKFORT, OWENS, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from a rejection of claims 56-63. Claims 1- 55 and 64-114 have been canceled. THE INVENTION The appellant claims a structural beam having a cavity containing a non-compressible material which, the appellant states (specification, page 1, lines 5-10), provides rigidity and/or vibration dampening. Claim 56 is illustrative: 56. A structural beam comprising: an upper surface; a lower surface; 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007