Appeal No. 2006-0977 Application 10/250,605 composition of Japanese ‘306. The motivation for such a selection arises from both the teaching in Japanese ‘306 that all epoxy resins may be used and the disclosure in Japanese ‘349 that the claimed epoxy resin lowers “the viscosity of the composition to provide higher filler loadings leading to improved reflow crack resistance and moisture resistance” (page 4 of answer, second paragraph). Appellants point to specification data for demonstrating that the composition of the present invention is flame retardant in the absence of conventional flame retardant additives and that “the compositions provide a good balance of moldability and solder crack resistance” (page 4 of brief, first paragraph). In particular, appellants cite Example 2 and Comparative Example A for demonstrating that the presence of the thiophenol provides “the favorable combination of both flame retardancy and solder crack resistance” (page 4 of brief, second paragraph). We agree with the examiner that the specification data does not address the thrust of the examiner’s rejection inasmuch as the epoxy resin encapsulating composition of Japanese ‘306 contains the thiophenol which appellants assert is responsible for the favorable combination of properties. Hence, the specification data does not 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007