The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SRINIVAS DODDI, LAWRENCE LANE, VI VUONG,
MIKE LAUGHERY, JUNWEI BAO, KELLY BARRY,
NICKHIL JAKATDAR and EMMANUEL DREGE
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0996
Application No. 10/162,516
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellants request that we reconsider our decision of May 15,
2006 wherein we sustained the rejection of claims 1, 6, 8, 9, 13,
27, 29, 38-41, 48, and 54 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. ' 102 and
the rejection of claims 10 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007