Appeal No. 2006-0998 Application No. 10/076,729 After a review of Davis, we agree with Appellants’ assertion that the claimed managing configuration of the operating system of the network clients is different from installing a software update. Davis in col. 2, lines 15-21 states: The system described herein provides for automatically installing software on heterogeneous client computer systems. In a distributed system having heterogeneous computer systems of different natural languages, different operating system types, or different processor types, the system described herein automatically installs the appropriate edition of software onto client computers. Therefore, although the specific type of the operating system on the network client is taken into consideration during the software installation, the installed software is matched to the operating system without any attempt to manage configuration of the operating system (col. 2, lines 58-64). The Examiner has in fact pointed to no teachings in Davis to indicate that any changes to the configuration of the operating system of the network client is made. We also agree with Appellants (reply brief, page 3) that such centralized management for installing software on network clients may consider the clients’ different operating systems for installing software updates, but does not manage configuration of the operating system of the network clients. -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007