The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NORBERT DIEKHANS
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1015
Application No. 10/358,460
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CRAWFORD, NAPPI, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 22 to 28,
30 to 32, 34, 35 and 37 to 43, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Claims 1 to 20 have been cancelled. Claims 29, 33 and 36 have been found allowable.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007