Ex Parte Williams - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-1026                                                        
          Application No. 09/682,279                                                  

          Representative claim 5 is reproduced as follows:                            
               5. An illuminating device for the Universal Serial Bus (USB)           
          comprising:                                                                 
               a. an elongated, standard USB wire comprising:                         
                    i. a flexible, tubular stabilizing agent which is                 
          easily bendable, and                                                        
                    ii. having a first end and a second end;                          
               b. a USB connector electronically coupled to said first end            
          of said elongated, standard USB wire;                                       
               c. an illuminating light(s) electronically coupled to said             
          second end of said elongated, standard USB wire.                            
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Tseng                      5,615,945              Apr. 01, 1997             
          Kim                        5,938,770              Aug. 17, 1999             
          Claims 5, 6 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).                  
          As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Tseng in view of             
          Kim.  The examiner’s rejection of claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 112             
          has been withdrawn by the examiner [answer, page 4].  Rather than           
          repeat the arguments of appellant or the examiner, we make                  
          reference to the brief and the answer for the respective details            
          thereof.                                                                    
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal,                  
          the rejection advanced by the examiner and the evidence of                  
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007