The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DAVID S. DE LORENZO, STEPHEN W. MONTGOMERY WARREN R. MORROW and ROBIN STEINBRECHER __________ Appeal No. 2006-1056 Application No. 10/606,514 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7, 13-19, and 25-31. Claims 8-12, 20-24, and 32-36 have been indicated by the examiner as being drawn to allowable subject matter and are not on appeal before us. The invention pertains to a system for thermal management ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007