The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WILFRIED JUD and HANS-RUDOLF NAGELI ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1061 Application No. 09/505,713 ____________ HEARD: May 09, 2006 ____________ Before KRATZ, TIMM and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal the decision of the Examiner finally rejecting claims 38 to 53, all of the pending claims. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §134.1 1 In rendering this decision, we have considered Appellants’ arguments presented in the Brief, filed February 2, 2004.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007