Ex Parte Jud et al - Page 1





                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                         
                    written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         


                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
                                                  ____________                                                 
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                  ____________                                                 
                              Ex parte WILFRIED JUD and  HANS-RUDOLF NAGELI                                    
                                                  ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2006-1061                                              
                                          Application No. 09/505,713                                           
                                                  ____________                                                 
                                             HEARD: May 09, 2006                                               
                                                  ____________                                                 
                Before KRATZ, TIMM and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                         
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                 



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                       Applicants appeal the decision of the Examiner finally rejecting                        
                claims 38 to 53, all of the pending claims.  We have jurisdiction under                        
                35 U.S.C. §134.1                                                                               




                                                                                                              
                       1  In rendering this decision, we have considered Appellants’ arguments                 
                presented in the Brief, filed February 2, 2004.                                                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007