Appeal No. 2006-1065 Application No. 10/296,231 Appellants have not contested the examiner’s double patenting rejections but “will file a Terminal Disclaimer” over each of these patents upon the indication of otherwise allowable subject matter” (page 3 of Reply Brief, penultimate paragraph). In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner’s decision of rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED Edward C. Kimlin ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Charles F. Warren ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Beverly A. Franklin ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007