Appeal No. 2006-1090 Application No. 09/848,005 the rejection of claim 28, nor of claims 29 and 30 that incorporate the limitations of claim 28. CONCLUSION The rejection of claims 20-25 and 27-30 under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 is affirmed with respect to claims 20-25 and 27, but reversed with respect to claims 28-30. The examiner’s decision is thus affirmed-in-part. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). See 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED-IN-PART JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MAHSHID D. SAADAT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) -8-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007