Ex Parte Owen et al - Page 3



         Appeal No. 2006-1101                                                       
         Application No. 10/193,560                                                 

         cutting and tack-sealing action to the zipper whereby ends of              
         the zipper are tack-sealed when cut from the continuous length             
         of zipper.                                                                 
         5. An apparatus for cutting and producing tack-seals on a                  
         zipper supplied from a continuous length of zipper, said                   
         apparatus comprising:                                                      
              means for simultaneously cutting and fusing a first end               
         section of the continuous length of zipper so that a first tack-           
         seal is provided at the first end section; and                             
              means for simultaneously cutting and fusing a second end              
         section of the continuous length of zipper so that a second                
         tack-seal is provided at the second end section such that ends             
         of the zipper are tack-sealed when cut from the continuous                 
         length of zipper.                                                          
              The references set forth below are relied upon by the                 
         examiner as evidence of anticipation and obviousness:                      
         Brey et al. (Brey) 3,859,152 Jan.  7, 1975                                 
         Marbach 4,140,046 Feb. 20, 1979                                            
         McLean 4,317,697 Mar.  2, 1982                                             
         Diez et al. (Diez) 4,767,482 Aug. 30, 1988                                 
         Fukuyama 5,358,592 Oct. 25, 1994                                           
         Linkiewicz 6,012,264 Jan. 11, 2000                                         
         Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b):                                                  
         All appealed claims are rejected as anticipated by Diez;                   
              Claims 1 and 5 are rejected as anticipated by Fukuyama;               
              Claims 1 and 5 are rejected as anticipated by Marbach; and            
              Claim 5 is rejected as anticipated by Linkiewicz.                     



                                        -3-                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007