The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PALLATHERI M. SUBRAMANIAN, HOWARD CHUNG-HO NG and
ROSS A. LEE
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1117
Application No. 10/461,308
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 1 through 3, the only claims pending in
this application, as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see
the amendment dated Jan. 14, 2005, entered as per the Advisory
Action dated April 4, 2005; Brief, page 2; Answer, page 2, ¶(4)).
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a
multilayer film comprising at least a first resin layer of
poly(1,3-propylene 2,6-naphthalate)(PPN) and a second resin layer
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007