Ex Parte Norman et al - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 2006-1148                                                                                                                         
                 Application No. 10/382,492                                                                                                                   

                         interface means connected to receive control signals for at least one of said plurality                                              
                 of said lighting means from said central computer and to transmit monitoring data concerning                                                 
                 said lighting means to said central computer, said interface means being connected for                                                       
                 controlling said plurality of lighting means using said power distribution means for                                                         
                 transmitting light control signals and receiving light monitoring data from said plurality of                                                
                 lighting means; and                                                                                                                          
                         light controlling and monitoring means connected between said power distribution                                                     
                 means and at least one of said plurality of lighting means for receiving said light control                                                  
                 signals from said interface means for operating said at least one of said plurality of lighting                                              
                 means and for transmitting light monitoring data to said interface means using said power                                                    
                 distribution means.                                                                                                                          
                         The examiner relies on the following references:                                                                                     
                         Rodgers    3,152,315   Oct. 06, 1964                                                                                                 
                         Paredes    3,706,969   Dec. 19, 1972                                                                                                 
                         McHerron    4,313,063   Jan.  26, 1982                                                                                               
                         Schwarzbach et al. (Schwarzbach) 4,418,333   Nov. 29, 1983                                                                           
                         Knapp     4,808,982   Feb. 28, 1989                                                                                                  
                                                                                        (filed  Aug. 01, 1986)                                                
                         Tann               (British) 2,174,852             Nov. 12, 1986                                                                     
                         Claims 1-26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the                                                   
                 examiner offers Schwarzbach and Tann with regard to claims 1, 3, 4, 8, 10, and 11, adding to                                                 
                 this combination, Rodgers with regard to claims 2 and 9, Paredes with regard to claims 5, 6,                                                 
                 12, and 13, McHerron with regard to claims 7 and 14, and Knapp with regard to claims 15,                                                     
                 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, and 26.  With regard to claims 16 and 22, the examiner offers either                                                 
                 Schwarzbach or Tann in view of Knapp and Rodgers, but with regard to claims 19 and 25,                                                       
                 the examiner offers either one of Schwarzbach or Tann in view of Knapp and McHerron.                                                         
                         Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of appellants                                                
                 and the examiner.                                                                                                                            

                                                                 -2-                                                                                          













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007