Appeal No. 2006-1153
Application No. 10/123,269
patentability. Oetiker, 977 F.2d at 1445, 24 USPQ2d at 1444. As
a consequence, we also hereby also sustain the examiner’s Section
103 rejection based on Francis of claims 4, 6, 12, 15 and 17.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES F. WARREN ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
)
BEVERLY A. FRANKLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
BRG:hh
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007