Ex Parte Valles Camps et al - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for             
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                     ____________                                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                     ____________                                                     
                Ex parte JULIA VALLES CAMPS and XAVIER MIQUEL GUTIERREZ                               
                                     ____________                                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2006-1167                                                 
                              Application No. 09/948,601                                              
                                     ____________                                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                                       
                                     ____________                                                     
          Before PAK, KRATZ and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                               REMAND TO THE EXAMINER                                                 
               A Request for Reconsideration of a Decision on Petition1                               
          mailed February 01, 2006 was filed via facsimile transmission on                            
          April 25, 2006.  The petition was construed as a petition under                             
          37 CFR § 1.181 in the Decision mailed February 01, 2006.                                    
               Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction over the Request for                              
          Reconsideration and remand this application to the jurisdiction                             
          of Technology Center 3600 for appropriate processing of that                                
          Request.                                                                                    

                                                                                                      
               1 The “Reply Brief” was construed as a petition under 37 CFR                           
          § 1.181.  See Decision on Petiition mailed February 01, 2006.                               












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007