The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and isnot binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KEVIN L. BEAMAN, JOHN T. MOORE, and RONALD A. WEIMER ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1181 Application No. 10/393,718 ____________ ON BRIEF1 ____________ Before HAIRSTON, BLANKENSHIP and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 19-25. Claims 1-18 have been cancelled. We affirm. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention is directed generally to a method for adjusting the threshold voltage of transistors using a nitridization process and more specifically, to a semiconductor device utilizing such process. According to Appellants, an isolation layer 1 An oral hearing scheduled for May 24, 2006 has been waived via a facsimile transmission received April 6, 2006.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007