Appeal No. 2006-1187
Application No. 10/056,832
Rejections at Issue
Claims 1, 3 through 20, 22 through 32 and 491 through 52 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as directed to non-statutory subject matter. The
examiner’s rejection is set forth on pages 2 and 3 of the Final Office action
mailed on April 27, 2005.
Claim 51 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. §112, first paragraph, as failing
to comply with the written description requirement. The examiner’s rejection is
set forth on page 4 and Final Office action mailed April 27, 2005.
Claims 1, 4 through 7, 9, 10, 12, 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§102 (a) as being anticipated by Turkel. The examiner’s rejection is set forth on
pages 5, 6 and 7 of the Final Office action mailed April 27, 2005.
Claims 33 through 39 and 45 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
anticipated over officially noticed facts concerning two computers connected by
the internet. The examiner’s rejection is set forth on pages 8, 9 and 10 of the
Final Office action mailed April 27, 2005.
Claims 33 through 39 and 45 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §102(b) as
being anticipated by Hartman. The examiner’s rejection is set forth on pages 10
and 11 of the Final Office action mailed April 27 2005.
1 We note the final rejection did not address the rejection of claim 49 under 35
U.S.C. § 101. However, since both the Brief (See page 8 footnote 1) and the
Answer (see page 3) acknowledge claim 49 as rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007