Ex Parte Chabot - Page 5




              Appeal No. 2006-1189                                                                                          
              Application 10/707,148                                                                                        

              it. However, such expression alone, while somewhat imprecise, does not automatically                          
              render appellant’s claims 6, 9 and 10 indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph. If                  
              one of ordinary skill in the art would understand what is claimed upon consideration of the                   
              claim as a whole, in light of the specification, and thus would be reasonably informed as to                  
              the boundaries of what constitutes infringement, then the claim serves the notice function                    
              and meets the statutory requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.                                    
              The specification and claim 6 on appeal define the barrier as having a “low profile” and                      
              as including a plurality of upwardly extending sections or studs (12) that are of “limited                    
              height,” which is defined in claim 6 as meaning that the upwardly extending sections are                      
              “sufficiently short so that an infant would not be able to grab and detach any of said                        
              upwardly extending sections,” and further as being such as to permit older children and                       
              adults to step over the barrier. Paragraph [0011] of the specification indicates that the                     
              upwardly extending sections or studs are “of a very short length” and are designed so that                    
              contact with the studs will result in temporary discomfort sufficient to discourage an infant                 
              from further movement in a predetermined direction. Regarding the depth/width of the                          
              barrier, claim 6 indicates that the sheeting material of the barrier is “sized for older children             
              and adults to step over while still providing sufficient depth to discourage an infant from                   
              attempting to cross.” The specification (paragraph [0016]) provides further insight and                       
              indicates that the required depth or width of the barrier “is only to be of a distance which is               
              only slightly more than the step or two of an infant” and notes that, therefore, older children               
              and adults will have no difficulty stepping over the barrier or reaching across a barrier.                    
              Paragraph [0018] makes clear that the method of the present invention is intended to apply                    

                                                               5                                                            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007