Appeal No. 2006-1193 16
Application No. 09/961,036
and Yi with respect to representative claim 17, supra, and because
appellants have failed to point out exactly how the limitations of claim 18
distinguish over the combination of references relied upon by the examiner,
we will sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 18 for the same reasons set
forth by the examiner in the rejection.
In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejection of all claims
under appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 17-
19, 21, 23, and 25 is affirmed.
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007