Appeal 2006-1219
Application 10/636,148
Claims 2 through 5 ultimately depend from independent claim 1 and,
therefore, stand or fall with claim 1.
Accordingly, we also can not sustain the obviousness rejection of
claims 1 through 5.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the Examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
tf
Rohm and Haas Company
Patent Department
100 Independence Mall West
Philadelphia, PA 19106-2399
15
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: November 3, 2007