Ex Parte Luu et al - Page 2


                 Appeal No.  2006-1222                                                         Page 2                  
                 Application No.  10/141,442                                                                           
                        Claims 1 and 13 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are                       
                 reproduced below:                                                                                     
                         1. A lotion comprising a micro-emulsion composition, which is liquid at                       
                             room temperature and undergoes a phase change to a semi-solid or                          
                             solid upon contact with a substrate.                                                      
                        13. A lotion comprising a micro-emulsion, which comprises a polar                              
                             emollient, a non-polar emollient, a non-ionic surfactant, and a co-                       
                             surfactant.                                                                               

                        The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                
                 Warner et al. (Warner)  5,525,345   Jun. 11, 1996                                                     
                 Luu et al. (Luu)   5,871,763   Feb. 16, 1999                                                          


                                            GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                                       
                        Claims 1-18, 20-30 and 32-36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                        
                 anticipated by Warner.                                                                                
                        Claims 19, 31 and 37-50 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                          
                 unpatentable over the combination of Warner and Luu.                                                  
                        For the following reasons we vacate the rejections of record and remand                        
                 the application to the examiner for further consideration.                                            


                                                    DISCUSSION                                                         
                 Anticipation:                                                                                         
                        The rational for rejecting claims 1-18, 20-30 and 32-36 under 35 U.S.C.                        
                 § 102(b) as anticipated by Warner is missing from the Answer.  As set forth in                        
                 Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 1207.02, “[a]n examiner’s                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007