Ex Parte Eschbach - Page 3




               Appeal No. 2006-0775                                                                                                  
               Application No. 09/356,940                                                                                            

                       d.  password circuitry comprising a random number generator for randomly generating a                         
               plurality of passwords, wherein each of said plurality of passwords is uniquely associated with a                     
               respective one of said plurality of indicia in sequence.                                                              
                       The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                                 
               Noll et al. (Noll)   5,732,138            Mar. 24, 1998                                                               
               He     5,944,824            Aug. 31, 1999                                                                             
                                                                                      (filed Apr. 30, 1997)                          
               Bang     6,088,143            July  11, 2000                                                                          
                                                                                      (filed Jan.  23, 1998)                         
               Guthrie et al. (Guthrie)  6,161,185            Dec. 12, 2000                                                          
                                                                                      (filed Mar.   6, 1998)                         
               Ramachandran   6,315,195            Nov. 13, 2001                                                                     
                                                                      (effective filing date Apr. 17, 1998)                          
               McIntosh    2 274 184            July  13, 1994                                                                       
               (U.K. Patent Application)                                                                                             
                       Claims 33 through 52 stand rejected under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 for                          
               failing to comply with the written description requirement.                                                           
                       Claims 45 through 48 and 53 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                  
               unpatentable over McIntosh in view of He.                                                                             
                       Claims 45 through 48 and 53 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                  
               unpatentable over McIntosh in view of Noll.                                                                           
                       Claim 49 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over McIntosh                         
               in view of He and Bang.                                                                                               
                       Claims 50 through 52 and 54 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                  
               unpatentable over McIntosh in view of He and Guthrie.                                                                 



                                                                 3                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007