The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex Parte DEJAN KOZIC, CHARLES GOODALL, MOHSIN ANSARI and MIKE SIMKO _______________ Appeal No. 2006-1272 Application No. 10/104,615 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 3-42, which constitute all the claims pending in this application. The disclosed invention pertains to a system and method for providing pharmaceutical services to a plurality of remote sites from a central site. Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows: 1. A system for providing pharmaceutical services comprising: • a central site having a central video-conferencing station, the central video- conferencing station being operable for a pharmacist to perform pharmaceutical services from within the central site; andPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007