Ex Parte Mothrath et al - Page 8


                     Appeal No. 2006-1273                                                                                                           
                     Application No. 10/420,400                                                                                                     

                     that the catalyst can be added as a liquid.  See König et al.’s “Application examples” in                                      
                     which a 3% solution of tetraphosphonium phenolate is used to make polycarbonates (col.                                         
                     5, lines 32-34).   See also König et al.’s Example 2 wherein a liquid product is obtained                                      
                     by using a 10:1 molar ratio and a 100% yield is obtained.  (Col. 5, lines 5-22.)  Clearly, in                                  
                     order to avoid the additional steps of crystallizing the product and then resolubilizing it in                                 
                     phenol, with a possible loss in yield, it would have been desirable to make the product in                                     
                     the liquid form—a form already expressly taught and used by the prior art.                                                     
                              Turning to the addition of the slightly soluble alcohol and considering the claimed                                   
                     invention as a whole, we first note that the slightly soluble alcohols used by Appellants                                      
                     and disclosed in König et al. are substantially the same (compare König et al., col. 1,                                        
                     lines 53-64, with the ‘400 Application, page 7, line 22- page 8, line 5).  Likewise, the                                       
                     range ratios of alcohol to aqueous reaction mixture are substantially the same (compare                                        
                     claim 2 of König et al. with claim 1 of the ‘400 Application).  (See also the Examiner’s                                       
                     Answer, pages 4-5.)   Further, one of ordinary skill in this art would have recognized the                                     
                     alcohol addition could be made at any time prior to working up the reaction mixture.                                           
                     (See id.)  Such a modification to the process expressly taught by König et al. would have                                      
                     been expected to yield at least a comparable product.                                                                          
                              First, König et al. explain that the function of the alcohol is to facilitate working                                 
                     up the reaction mixture and therefore not to participate in the reaction (see col. 1, lines                                    
                     65-66; see also Examiner’s Ans., page 6).  Second, it is clear the alcohol is not necessary                                    
                     for the synthesis, in that the synthesis is also conducted by König et al. without the                                         
                     alcohol present (see, e.g., Example 2, col. 5, lines 5-22; see also Examiner’s Answer,                                         
                     page 4).  Finally, König et al. teach that adding the alcohol is preferred (col 2. lines 7-13).                                


                                                                         8                                                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007