The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JORGEN RASMUSSEN ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1277 Application No. 10/221,711 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Decided: JULY 26, 2006 ____________ Before FRANKFORT, BAHR and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 1-4 and 6-10. Claims 5 and 11 stand objected to as being dependent on a rejected claim and claims 12-25 have been indicated by the examiner as allowable. We REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007