Appeal No. 2006-1282 Παγε 7
Application No. 10/361,899
We will not sustain this rejection, as we agree with the appellant that Shank does
not cure the deficiencies discussed above with regard to the rejection of claim 1 from
which claim 7 depends.
In summary, the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 to 10 are not sustained. The
examiner’s rejections of claims 11 to 24 are sustained.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
TERRY J. OWENS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007