The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte Cristi Nesbitt Ullmann and Lorin Evan Ullmann ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1287 Application No. 10/047,116 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before RUGGIERO, BARRY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. A patent examiner rejected claims 1-28. The appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse. I. BACKGROUND The invention at issue on appeal concerns the recording of World Wide Web ("Web") browsing sessions for subsequent use, review, and analysis. (Spec. at 1.) High-end professionals and physically impaired people may have others conduct their Web browsing and searching. The value of the searches, however, is limited by the searcher's understanding of the problem to be searched. A resulting list of Web documents or Uniform Resource Locations ("URLs") selected by the searcher via hyperlink threads, furthermore, leaves insufficient information as to which hyperlinkPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007