Ex Parte Turek et al - Page 2


                Appeal No. 2006-1292                                                                       Page 2                            
                Application No. 10/314,742                                                                                                      

                         a plurality of pins disposed in the body, the pins extending from a flange side of                                     
                the header through to a body side of the header;                                                                                
                         a flange integral with the body for resting against the second surface of the                                          
                associated bulkhead such that a portion of the associated is engaged between the                                                
                tangs and flange to secure the header to the associated bulkhead, wherein the pins                                              
                provide electrical connection across the first and second surfaces of the associated                                            
                bulkhead;                                                                                                                       
                         a cover connected to the flange for overlying the pins at the flange side of the                                       
                header, the cover being integrally formed with and connected to the flange by a living                                          
                hinge, the cover including a latch to secure the cover in a closed position overlying the                                       
                pins and, when in a closed position, defining a space between the cover and the flange                                          
                for connecting electrical conductors to the electrical connectors; and                                                          
                         an interference member disposed at about the pins to permit connecting a                                               
                connector to the pins in only one orientation.                                                                                  
                         The following references are relied on by the examiner:                                                                
                Chrones    4,070,078  Jan 24, 1978                                                                                              
                Revil et al. (Revil)   4,979,910  Dec 25, 1990                                                                                  
                Hofmann et al. (Hofmann)  5,382,171  Jan. 17, 1995                                                                              
                Shinozaki    6,113,424  Sept. 5, 2000                                                                                           
                         Claims 1, 5, 7, 10, 12 through 21 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                         
                As evidence of obvious, the examiner relies upon Hofmann in view of Chrones and                                                 
                Revil as to claims 1, 5, 7, 10, 12 through 14, 16 through 18, 20 and 21, with the addition                                      
                of Shinozaki as to claims 15, 19 and 23.                                                                                        
                         Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and the examiner, reference is                                      
                made to the Brief and Reply Brief for appellants’ positions, and to the Answer for the                                          
                examiner’s positions.                                                                                                           
                                                                  OPINION                                                                       
                         For the reasons set forth by the examiner in the Answer, as expanded upon here,                                        
                we sustain the rejections of all claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                        
                         At the outset, we note that appellants have grouped the subject matter of                                              
                independent claims 1, 16 and 20 collectively as to their arguments presented as to the                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007